Sobre Seneca

Stoic ethics is naturalistic, and thus very modern in nature, but it—to put it in rather anachronistic terms—does not simplistically erase Hume’s is/ought divide.

New interest in Stoic logic came in the 20th century, when important developments in logic were based on propositional logic. Susanne Bobzien wrote, "The many close similarities between Chrysippus's philosophical logic and that of Gottlob Frege are especially striking."[17]

Diodorus Cronus, who was one of Zeno's teachers, is considered the philosopher who first introduced and developed an approach to logic now known as propositional logic, which is based on statements or propositions, rather than terms, making it very different from Aristotle's term logic. Later, Chrysippus developed a system that became known as Stoic logic and included a deductive system, Stoic Syllogistic, which was considered a rival to Aristotle's Syllogistic (see Syllogism).

do la carne y la vana gloria de la vida pelo proviene de Dios sino de o planeta, mas los qual hacen la voluntad por Dios en su palabra permanecen para siempre.

El nombre viene do los pórticos con columnas donde se reunían. Hoy la palabra coloquialmente significa "alguien de que se mantiene calmado bajo presión y evita extremos emocionales", pero el estoicismo era más que una actitud. Los estoicos creían en una red causal que resulta en una racionalidad universal que llamaban Logos

Stoic Ethics was not just another theoretical subject, but an eminently practical one. Indeed, especially for the later Stoics, ethics—understood as the study of how to live one’s life—was the

Irei discutir esse assunto de forma seletiva, escolhendo unicamente as partes disciplinares do estoicismo. Eu recomendo que você leia Muito mais A respeito de isso em seguida.

Los estoicos prestaron gran atención a los problemas por la conducta. El fin por la vida, la felicidad, consiste en alcanzar la virtud en sus sentido estoico (vivir conforme a la Ley de la naturaleza). Para el hombre, dado de que el universo está regido por una Ley Conterraneo, conformarse con las leyes del universo en sentido amplio y adaptar su conducta a su propia naturaleza esencial a la razón, forman una unidad.

” Take a step back from your own concerns and remind yourself of your duty to others. Take Plato’s view.

Contrast this to the rather extreme (even for the time) take of the Cynics, who not only thought that virtue was the only good, like Socrates, but that the additional goods that Aristotle was worried about were actually distractions and needed to be positively avoided.

Estas bien con lo q dices, porque ninguna de las Destes filosofías hay fundamento alguno, si no en Cristo Jesus

It may very well be that these latter things are not to be comprehended by the human mind, and even if one assumes that they are perfectly comprehensible, well what profit comes from comprehending them? And ought we not to say that those men trouble in vain who assign all this as necessary to the philosopher’s system of thought? [...] What Nature is, and how she administers the universe, and whether she really exists or not, these are questions about which there is pelo need to go on to bother ourselves” (Fragments 1). Please remember that for the Stoics “nature” was synonymous with “god.”

Remember that achievements can be ephemeral, and that your possession of them is for just an instant.

All of the above notwithstanding, what is most vital about Stoicism during the Roman Imperial period, however, is also what arguably made the philosophy’s impact reverberate throughout the centuries, eventually leading to two revivals, the so-called Neostoicism of the Renaissance, and the current “modern Stoicism” movement to which I will turn at the end of this essay. The sources of such vitality were fundamentally two: on veja mais the one hand charismatic teachers like Musonius and Epictetus, and on the other hand influential political figures like Seneca and Marcus.

Para saber mais Educação Financeira